Comparative Constitutional Traditions

A.Y. 2024/2025
6
Max ECTS
42
Overall hours
SSD
IUS/21
Language
English
Learning objectives
The course will give the students the methodological tools to analyze and compare different constitutional traditions. The course will focus on the traditions of Western Legal culture and the constitutional traditions in the Global South. The students will gain an in-depth knowledge of the challenges of contemporary constitutional systems across the globe
Expected learning outcomes
At the end of the course, the students will be able to critically assess the different constitutional traditions from a comparative perspective. They will be able to address the main contemporary challenges of constitutional law in comparative perspectives, also identifying the specificity of each different constitutional tradition at a global level.
They will be able to analyze the case law of different jurisdictions and compare the legal reasoning.
Single course

This course can be attended as a single course.

Course syllabus and organization

Single session

Responsible
Lesson period
First semester
Course syllabus
Comparing different constitutional systems is "somewhat like travelling. The traveller and the comparatist are invited to break away from daily routines, to meet the unexpected and, perhaps, to get to know the unknown" (Frankenberg 1985).
In the light of the this premise, the course aims at addressing the complexity and the interaction of the different legal traditions of the world (Western tradition, Islamic law, Asian law) in comparative perspective. The course will highlight the ongoing tension between the historical and cultural paths of the different legal traditions on one side, and the uniformising effect of legal globalization. How can we reconcile the specificity of the different legal systems with the ongoing convergence among national constitutional systems in their structures and in their protection of fundamental rights? In other words, how can the comparatist reconcile the strongly national attitude of constitutional law with the end of boundaries fostered by globalization processes?
Global constitutionalism is based on the assumption that western-type constitutional law has universal application and is not culturally limited in scope. The course will critically asses this far-reaching assumption concerning the one-size fits all liberal constitutionalism, and it will highlight that there are different local adaptation of the same principles of liberal constitutionalism. Constitutional ideas are not only normative rules and doctrines but are also the objects of political and societal conflicts having different legal-cultural context.
The second part of the course will focus on the ongoing constitutionals tensions within the EU. It will address the rule of law crisis and the tensions in the field of human rights protection.

Specific topics:
Part I
-What is a tradition?
-Why Compare law?
-The clash between legal traditions and globalization
-Western constitutional systems and constitutionalism in the global South
-Form of States in comparative perspective (liberal democracy, authoritarian states, totalitarian states).
-New challenges: abusive constitutionalism
-Constitutional democracy in Crisis
-The rise of Juristrocracy. Case law discussion.
-The use of comparative law by Constitutional Courts.
-Human rights: universal or particular?
-Transformative constitutionalism
-Case law analysis: Freedom of religion, same-sex marriage, minority rights, the rights of nature.

Part II:
- Constitutional traditions in Europe
- The EU accession process and the Copenhagen Criteria
- The rule of law crisis in Europe
- Conditionality and human rights protection
- Convergence and Regionalization in HR protection
Prerequisites for admission
No prerequisites.
Teaching methods
The course will be structured on lectures, guests seminars and the discussion of case-studies. Students will have the unique opportunity to discuss relevant questions with key international experts in comparative constitutional law.
Teaching Resources
R. Scarciglia, Methods and Legal Comparison, Challenges for Methodological Pluralism, Elgar, 2023.
Further reading materials for attendant students will be made available on the Moodle website of the course.

Non attendant students: D. Law, Constitutionalism in Context, CUP, 2022. Pages: 1-184; 426-516. R. Scarciglia, Methods and Legal Comparison, Challenges for Methodological Pluralism, Elgar, 2023, Pages: 1-32; 85-131; 157-191.
Assessment methods and Criteria
Attendant students: Students' grade will be based on class participation and on a written exam.
Non attendant students: Oral Exam.
The final mark/grade will be expressed in **/30.
IUS/21 - COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW - University credits: 6
Lessons: 42 hours
Shifts:
Turno
Professors: Baraggia Antonia, Violini Lorenza
Professor(s)
Reception:
Mondays 12:15-13:30, please book on https://calendly.com/antonia-baraggia/15min
On-line on Teams or in presence, please specify it when booking the meeting.
Reception:
To schedule an appointment write to [email protected]
On Microsoft Teams